<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>argumentation</title>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://links.biapy.com/guest/tags/1776/feed"/>
    <updated>2026-04-18T19:53:38+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://links.biapy.com/guest/tags/1776/feed</id>
            <entry>
            <id>https://links.biapy.com/links/3810</id>
            <title type="text"><![CDATA[Argdown]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://argdown.org/" />
            <link rel="via" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://links.biapy.com/links/3810"/>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[Biapy]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="text">
                <![CDATA[A simple syntax for complex argumentation.

- Listing pros &amp;amp; cons in Argdown is as simple as writing a twitter message. You don&amp;#039;t have to learn anything new, except a few simple rules that will feel very natural.
- With these simple rules you will be able to define more complex relations between arguments or dive into the details of their logical premise-conclusion structures.

- [Argdown @ GitHub](https://github.com/christianvoigt/argdown).]]>
            </summary>
            <updated>2025-08-29T02:31:35+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
